The
Innovation
On March 22, 2015, it was announced that Boeing had patented
the concept of what could possibly be the world’s first “force field”. Simply
the thought of a force field seems as though it should be reserved for the
science fiction writers, only to be seen on the big screen; which is why I am
going to be taking a look at the idea as a whole with regards to:
- What the innovation is,
- What it would mean to the world, and
- The feasibility of the idea.
The Concept
The general idea behind the “force field” concept, more
particularly (and accurately) referred to as a “method and system for shockwave
attenuation via electromagnetic arc” is one that the scientific community has
sought after for years, ever since Star Trek and Star Wars and a whole menagerie
of science fiction stories have been around.
The physics of the device would be fairly straightforward.
The invention would be designed to disrupt shockwaves from explosives in order
to protect vehicles or buildings from these damaging waves. It would achieve
this by using a sensor to detect a shockwave (most likely through pressure
changes or flashes of light caused by an explosion) and an arc generator. The
generator would receive a signal from the sensor and, using lasers, would ionize
an area around the desired vehicle or building, creating a plasma field. This
field would have different physical properties than the surrounding medium, and
therefore would (at least partially) protect the desired object from the
shockwaves that would otherwise damage it. It would not however, prevent
shrapnel and other debris from penetrating the field.
The patent specifically reads, “Such embodiments as
described above may reduce the energy density of the shockwave by creating a
second medium in the path of the advancing shockwave that reflects, refracts,
absorbs, and deflects at least a portion of the shockwave.
What Does
This Mean?
With the increasing use of IED (improvised explosive device)
weapons and other explosives in today’s modern warfare, the threat to military
vehicles from explosives is very real. The shockwave attenuation system would
be invaluable in all military vehicles, as well as airplanes (from proximity
airborne explosives), and buildings. The system would also be incredibly useful
in aquatic vessels such as large ships since explosions are amplified by going through
a non-compressive medium such as water. As far as military defense goes, this
would be a game-changer.
How
Feasible is the Idea?
The idea itself is definitely possible. Boeing has
reportedly already done a fair amount of testing of the idea on a small scale,
so we know it is not far-fetched. The feasibility of equipping every military
vehicle/vessel/aircraft/building with these devices however, is questionable.
First, you have the issue of size. It is undetermined how
large such a device would have to be to adequately protect a vehicle such as a
HUM-V, but when you are looking at an object as large as something like the
supercarrier USS John C. Stennis (pictured below), measuring in at a staggering
1092 feet in length and displacing 103,300 tons of water, you can only imagine
the scale of a device needed to protect such a vessel. Second, you would have
to look at cost. As it has not been stated how much a shockwave attenuation
device would cost, one can only estimate; but in order to equip all (or at
least most) military vehicles with them, it would more than likely be a massive
sum of money. Third, there is really no way of knowing when this concept could
become reality, so until then, we will have to stay living in our science
non-fiction world.
(credit official US Navy photos, defense.gov)
Really liked how you set up that article. It was easy to read and well broken down into very appropriate sections. As far as the tech, that is a very fascinating subject. The fact that they are trying stuff like that makes you wonder what else they are capable of. You did a very good job describing how it works. I wonder how feasible it would really be, if your still gonna get pieces of shrapnel coming through. Granted that would be an improvement over a direct hit, but price always factors in.
ReplyDeleteI could see this being used on things of greater importance, such as Air Force One. I don't know even if they had the technology if they would put it on a carrier? How often are those getting shot at or sunk. That being said we never know where the world could be in 50 years when this technology is probably more feasible. Also interesting to think just what they would need to cover such a vessel in terms of power and how effective it would really be.
This reminded me of how they are looking into lasers to shoot down missiles and things of that nature. Since this technology would be more applicable to protecting smaller things and not able to protect against projectiles with much greater fire power. They are quite different in that way. You did a good job describing it and I had very little confusion going through the article. Interesting read and you presented it well.